Nominee vs. Legal Heir in India: Supreme Court Rules Explained

Nominee vs. Legal Heir in India: Supreme Court Rules Explained

In landmark rulings from Sarbati Devi to Shakti Yezdani (2023), the Supreme Court of India has settled the law: a nominee is merely a caretaker trustee, and your Will always overrides nomination.

FILED UNDERSupreme Court Precedent
PUBLISHEDOctober 08, 2026
READING TIME6 min
WRITTEN BY
Advocate Sunita DeshmukhPartner, Succession & Wealth Practice, AMA Legal Solutions

The ₹1.84 Lakh Crore Myth: 'I Already Added a Bank Nominee'

Across India, millions of depositors, equity investors, and NRI account holders skip drafting a Will because they believe clicking 'Add Nominee' on their net-banking portal, Zerodha/Groww Demat account, or mutual fund folio settles who inherits that wealth.

In Indian law, nomination and inheritance are two completely distinct legal concepts. A nomination exists solely to give the bank, insurance company, or depository participant a valid discharge of liability so the institution knows whose hands to place the funds into immediately after the account holder's passing.

“A nominee is a mere stop-gap custodian or receiving hand. Legal ownership of the asset vests strictly in the beneficiaries named in a valid Will—or, if there is no Will, in all statutory legal heirs equally.”

Supreme Court Rulings: Sarbati Devi & Shakti Yezdani (2023)

In Smt. Sarbati Devi v. Smt. Usha Devi (1984), the Supreme Court held that a nominee under Section 39 of the Insurance Act does not acquire beneficial ownership of life insurance proceeds; the money forms part of the deceased's estate and is governed by the law of succession.

For years, financial intermediaries argued that Demat share accounts and company shares were an exception under Section 109A of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Section 72 of the Companies Act, 2013) and Section 9.11 of the Depositories Act bylaws. On December 14, 2023, a division bench of the Supreme Court in Shakti Yezdani & Anr. v. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar permanently settled this debate: the Court ruled that the Companies Act and Depositories Act do not create a 'third mode of succession' and a nominee of shares or Demat securities holds them purely in fiduciary trust for the legal heirs or legatees under a Will.

What Happens When Your Nomination and Your Will Conflict?

Suppose a father nominates his elder son on a ₹50 Lakh Fixed Deposit for convenience, assuming the elder son knows to split it equally with his sister, or suppose the father leaves a Will bequeathing his financial portfolio to his wife while an old bank account still lists a brother as nominee.

Upon death, the bank will transfer the ₹50 Lakh to the nominee's account. However, the legal beneficiaries under the Will (or Class I heirs if intestate) have an enforceable right to demand their share from the nominee. Without a clear Will aligning nominations with intended bequests, families are dragged into civil recovery suits and freezing injunctions.

The Statutory Exception: EPF and Gratuity Nominations

While bank accounts (Section 45ZA Banking Regulation Act), mutual funds, PPF, real estate society shares, and Demat accounts treat the nominee as a trustee, Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) and Payment of Gratuity Act schemes restrict valid nominations to defined 'family members' and confer direct statutory rights on eligible family nominees. Even there, explicitly referencing your EPF, NPS, and superannuation accounts inside your Will prevents ambiguity among surviving dependents.

What to do next

List every bank account (Savings, NRE, NRO, FD), Demat account, Mutual Fund folio, PPF, and insurance policy along with who is currently recorded as the nominee

Draft a legally valid Will that explicitly names both the ultimate beneficiary and the percentage share for each financial account

Update your bank and Demat nominations so the nominee matches the primary beneficiary named in your Will

Frequently Asked Statutory Questions

Does a Demat account or mutual fund nominee become the owner of the shares?

No. In Shakti Yezdani v. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar (2023), the Supreme Court held that a Demat or share nominee is merely a fiduciary trustee and must transfer the securities to the beneficiaries named in the deceased's Will or statutory legal heirs.

Which prevails in India if a bank nomination and a Will name different people?

The Will always prevails for legal ownership. While the bank gets a valid discharge by releasing funds to the nominee, the beneficiary named in the Will has the legal right to recover the funds from the nominee.

Notice: This article summarizes binding Supreme Court of India precedents including Sarbati Devi (1984) and Shakti Yezdani (2023), as well as the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (including the Banking Laws Amendment norms).
Continue Reading

More from the journal

All notes
NRI Will for Indian Property: The Two-Will Strategy & FEMA Rules
NRI Estate Planning7 min

NRI Will for Indian Property: The Two-Will Strategy & FEMA Rules

Relying on a single US, UK, UAE, or Canadian Will to transfer Indian real estate and NRE/NRO bank accounts forces your family into multi-year foreign probate re-sealing under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act.

October 12, 2026
Probate of a Will in India: The 2025 Amendment Explained
Statutory Reform6 min

Probate of a Will in India: The 2025 Amendment Explained

For 100 years, Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act forced Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains in Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata to obtain compulsory court probate. Here is how the Repealing and Amending Act, 2025 changes the law—and when probate is still required.

October 04, 2026